Trust & transparency
Evidence-Grading Methodology
The transparent A–D framework used to summarize clinical maturity without hiding uncertainty.
A — Approved or strong
An approved medical application or a strong, replicated body of controlled clinical evidence relevant to the claim being described. Approval for one indication does not automatically support unrelated uses.
B — Limited human evidence
Relevant human studies exist, but the evidence is limited by size, replication, design, duration, population or applicability to the marketed claim.
C — Early or preclinical
The record is mainly animal, cell, mechanistic or very early human research. Human efficacy is not established, and long-term safety may be unknown.
D — Anecdotal or insufficient
Evidence is anecdotal, contradictory, indirect, proprietary, or too sparse to support a reliable conclusion. A D grade is not proof of ineffectiveness; it is a statement about evidentiary insufficiency.
How grades are assigned
- Assess the evidence for the specific substance, route and claim rather than borrowing certainty from a related compound.
- Weight controlled human evidence above observational, animal, cell and anecdotal reports.
- Treat safety certainty separately from evidence of effect.
- Never allow vendor status, sponsorship, price or affiliate performance to influence the grade.